Eigen RadarAI
Archive
Analysis

DistroKid removes songs over UMG claims as artists question the takedowns

DistroKid has confirmed removing recordings in response to Universal Music Group’s claims while continuing to dispute the label’s lawsuit. Musicians say songs made without AI were also taken down, sometimes without warning. The Verge’s single report carries the company’s response and those artist accounts; neither the full removal count nor the validity of individual copyright claims has been established.

Artificial Intelligence··Midday
A rear-view musician stands beside a studio microphone, with headphones in the foreground and a guitar nearby.

The distributor ties removals to UMG’s claims

DistroKid confirmed removing a small number of recordings following claims by Universal Music Group. The distributor carries musicians’ work to streaming platforms. Amanda Ferri, its vice president responsible for artist services, told The Verge on October 10 that DistroKid strongly disputed UMG’s lawsuit allegations and regretted the disruption. The company did not give a total removal count.[1]

UMG’s September lawsuit accuses DistroKid of copyright infringement and deceptive trading practices, alongside facilitating a pipeline of music generated with AI. DistroKid has now connected its action on recordings to that dispute. Musicians say works made without AI were also affected; those statements do not establish the merits of the copyright allegations.[1]

McGwire disputes claims on six removed tracks

McGwire says the takedowns affected six of his songs and arrived without notice; he received no message afterward either. The musician contests the licensing complaints: he says a Stevie Wonder cover was licensed, while a purchased beat was also available to other artists. He disputes a sampling accusation because the allegedly copied piece was released two years later than his track. To seek an explanation, McGwire first dealt with a chatbot and subsequently contacted human staff.[1]

Other artists seek warning and an explanation

Insane Ian said he received no warning when an original song disappeared. An unexplained takedown also affected a collaborator’s album, according to King Chase, after it had spent three to four years online. Jesse Cannon, a producer, called for advance notice and a chance for musicians to challenge the claims. Ferri said DistroKid was trying to reduce the disruption and preserve access to music distribution for artists.[1]

References

  1. News sourceThe VergeDistroKid confirms removing recordings over UMG claims↩1↩2↩3↩4
AI safety and regulation

More analysis from this desk

View all Brief analyses from the Artificial Intelligence desk →