Price pressure is narrowing policy room as growth slows
Three Chinese activity gauges in contraction, slower US growth and low saving, plus a UK minority seeking a rate rise show that easing room is uneven.
Economics & Markets··Morning
All three Chinese gauges fell below 50
China's official manufacturing PMI fell 1.1 points to 49.2% in July. The non-manufacturing activity index was 49.0% and the composite output index 49.3%, placing all three below the 50% threshold separating expansion from contraction. New orders fell to 48.5% and production to 49.9%. All three main gauges had been above 50% in June; the bureau said enterprise production and activity slowed from the previous month. The sub-indices also separate where the slowdown sits: raw-material inventories and supplier delivery times stayed below the threshold, while employment improved but remained in contraction territory. PMI is not a quantity of output; it is a monthly diffusion gauge derived from business responses. The July result therefore does not measure the whole economy, but it quickly shows changes in orders, production and expectations. New orders below production separate current work from future demand. A small employment improvement does not close that gap; production alone would be weak evidence of durable expansion without an orders recovery.[1]
US growth slowed and the saving share thinned
The US economy grew at a 1.5% annual rate in the second quarter, down from 2.1% in the first. The same release showed the PCE price index rising 5.1% during the quarter. June data put annual PCE inflation at 3.7% and the core rate at 3.3%, while spending outpaced income and the saving rate fell to 2.7%. Together, the releases show slower output alongside still-elevated price growth in household accounts. Within GDP, consumption, investment and exports added to growth while government spending declined; higher imports reduced the calculation. In the June household accounts, most spending growth came from services and real spending also increased. A second GDP estimate is due in August. The detail shows that slower growth was not a complete stop in spending, but a change in the mix of contributions and their inflation-adjusted pace. A low saving rate ties near-term consumption more tightly to income without describing household debt, assets or distribution. Quarterly GDP and monthly income-spending data also cover different periods and should not be treated as one release.[2], [3]
The UK hold was not unanimous
The Bank of England voted 6-3 to hold Bank Rate at 3.75%, with three members preferring an increase to 4%. Consumer inflation had fallen to 2.6%, yet the committee expects energy costs to add pressure later in the year and says second-round wage and price effects remain limited so far. The Chinese, US and UK data do not establish one global cycle; they show slowdown and price pressure narrowing the policy mix differently across economies. The committee's energy emphasis shows why the decision does not rest on one inflation number. Brent crude and UK gas were elevated and volatile relative to before the conflict, and the committee is watching whether persistent energy pressure spreads into wage and price setting. It sees limited evidence of those second-round effects so far. The minority favouring a rise shows members assigning different weight to future energy pass-through under the same current data. The decision cannot be reduced to a high-or-low inflation label. The committee weighs current easing, prospective energy pass-through and softer demand, and the vote shows that one forecast can support different risk balances.[4], [1], [2], [3]
Related columns
For more information on this topic, you can read the related columns.
