Studies of plants, a tick and a shark trace observed changes in feeding, asexual reproduction, germination and head development across environments, life stages and geographic spread.
Science··Evening
Acquiring nutrients and germinating at the right moment
Saxifraga candelabrum, an alpine flower growing around Shangri-La in Yunnan, catches small insects with a sticky secretion. Mature plants carried an average of 71 insects, mostly gnats in the family Chironomidae, while larger pollinators escaped the secretion. Phosphatase activity in the glandular hairs showed that prey could be broken down, and nitrogen from ¹⁵N-labelled flies rose inside the plant, showing that the nutrient was absorbed. The study joined capture, digestion and nutrition in one species. Ruppia maritima responded to another opening in Florida's Indian River Lagoon. Freshwater input and lower salinity clearly increased seed germination, while a nursery population established in 2021 continues to renew itself. With close to 20 percent of historical seagrass habitat lost worldwide, that persistence made the species a restoration candidate for damaged parts of the lagoon. Field restoration remains ahead: the planting method and environmental conditions that work under natural conditions have yet to be established. The two plants connect access to resources with timing. One captures animal nitrogen and uses it for nutrition; the other germinates during the opening created by lower salinity.[1], [3]
A reproductive route arising repeatedly during spread
As the Asian longhorned tick Haemaphysalis longicornis moved beyond its native Asian range, females capable of producing offspring without fertilization became prominent. Only parthenogenetic females have established populations outside the previously known range, suggesting that this reproductive route helps a single individual found a new population. The genetic picture first looked simpler. A mitochondrial tree split into branches aligned with sexual and asexual reproduction, supporting the possibility that one asexual lineage had spread worldwide. Three males found inside the predominantly asexual branch changed that interpretation. Genome-wide single-nucleotide variants also indicated gene flow between the branches. Together, those observations fit repeated origins of parthenogenesis within the species better than one globally expanding asexual lineage. A trait associated with spread therefore appears in more than one genetic setting. The researchers interpret the capacity for parthenogenesis as an enabler of invasive success rather than a complete account of that success. The plant reports foreground individual responses to nutrient access and environmental timing; the tick report follows reproductive strategy through the history of populations.[2]
A head reshaped as the animal matures
In the bonnethead shark Sphyrna tiburo, the shovel-shaped front of the head changes with age. Measurements in two Florida bays showed that young males and females begin with more pointed heads and that the head becomes rounder in both sexes as maturity advances. The change was stronger in females, conflicting with the earlier explanation that males develop a pointed head upon reaching sexual maturity. The researchers considered head shape alongside feeding. The two bays had distinct food webs, yet males and females within each bay shared many local resources, leaving the dietary explanation for the sex difference without support. The pointed shape's function remains open. The team proposes that it may aid swimming in young, smaller sharks and that the advantage may diminish as females grow for reproduction and gestation. Work on swimming performance and embryonic development could clarify that possibility. Together, the four developments show biological change operating at different scales. Saxifraga takes up nitrogen from prey, Ruppia germinates when salinity falls, the tick acquires an asexual reproductive route in different lineage contexts, and the shark's head is reshaped during an individual's life. The tick finding follows evolutionary origins, the shark finding follows development, and the plant findings describe functional responses to nutrients and environmental conditions.[1], [2], [3], [4]
Related columns
For more information on this topic, you can read the related columns.
